1978 late date no maker M39
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2024 5:22 pm
I'd like to discuss the late date M39 rifles, and their dates for a moment. It's my understanding that they were made from 1967-70, as well as a few in 1973.
That was at least until I saw a post of this particular 1978 rifle in a Facebook group I'm a member of:
Upon thinking about and looking at a few things, I Believe that this particular rifle may have been dated incorrectly at the armory. Here are the reasons why:
First, the serial number of the gun also ends in 78, I think it's possible that the armorer may have accidentally mixed up the serial and date when stamping it.
Next, it's possible it could have been intended to be a 1969 or 70, but the armorer accidentally used a 8 stamp. Maybe the armorer forgot his glasses that day, and a 8 does look similar to a 9 or a 0(if the 0 has a slash through the center like some fonts have).
Finally, and I think most convincingly, is the serial number. These late date rifles started at around 300000 and the serials increased sequentially. For example: my 1967 rifle is 300793, my 1968 rifle is 302330, and my 1970 rifle is 305289. I have seen 1970 rifles and 1973 rifles in the 306000 range as well. The 1978 dated rifle is serial 305278, precisely 11 places before my 1970 with serial 305289. Here is a photo of my 1970, and another with a higher serial I found on the internet:
The 1978 rifle is super neat and an oddity for sure, but unless anyone has seen other examples of these past 1973, I don't think that's a correct date.
What does everyone else think?
That was at least until I saw a post of this particular 1978 rifle in a Facebook group I'm a member of:
Upon thinking about and looking at a few things, I Believe that this particular rifle may have been dated incorrectly at the armory. Here are the reasons why:
First, the serial number of the gun also ends in 78, I think it's possible that the armorer may have accidentally mixed up the serial and date when stamping it.
Next, it's possible it could have been intended to be a 1969 or 70, but the armorer accidentally used a 8 stamp. Maybe the armorer forgot his glasses that day, and a 8 does look similar to a 9 or a 0(if the 0 has a slash through the center like some fonts have).
Finally, and I think most convincingly, is the serial number. These late date rifles started at around 300000 and the serials increased sequentially. For example: my 1967 rifle is 300793, my 1968 rifle is 302330, and my 1970 rifle is 305289. I have seen 1970 rifles and 1973 rifles in the 306000 range as well. The 1978 dated rifle is serial 305278, precisely 11 places before my 1970 with serial 305289. Here is a photo of my 1970, and another with a higher serial I found on the internet:
The 1978 rifle is super neat and an oddity for sure, but unless anyone has seen other examples of these past 1973, I don't think that's a correct date.
What does everyone else think?