New user, new PU authenticity check :)
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 2:21 pm
Hi all,
New user here and like others, I am so glad I found this forum. I've been reading and reading about how to spot a 'fake' sniper from a real one but I'm still not 100% 'in the know' on it. I have seen two rifles, both pretty similar that appear to be 'genuine' snipers but I'm not sure if they have been refinished by an amateur, or by an arsenal...
Both are Izvhesk, one is 1943 and the other is 1944. As the pictures of the 1943 one online aren't great, I'll start by asking about the 44 one, as it has pretty high quality images. Here are my thoughts (again, I am new to this so I'm just stating what I can see based on what I've read).
- Appears to show all the correct marks. I can see the 'C' stamp on the receiver and although the image is top down, the serial number on the barrel shank can be seen as is the correct number of digits to match the scope's serial
- The rear sight has been scrubbed down to the white, which I have read was done during a refurb on PU snipers by another nation who used them (I cannot remember which, perhaps Poland or Yugoslavia?) but images I have seen of others are scrubbed right up beyond the 2000 mark
- The serial for the rifle and scope make me think it is original to the rifle. I say this because the I found a list of Mosin snipers on GB and the nb serial for several others seem to be in a similar range and the rifle and scope serial are in the same range as other matched rifle. The closest other rifle was - nb 2539 (PU, 1944, scope 4429245)
- As there is no serial etched onto the mount, I am guessing that the scope is original to the rifle and given the proximity to the rifle and scope serials on the point above, it leads me to believe it is so
- My only concern is that I've read on this forum that the bolt and magazine should have the letter prexfix on them, otherwise this could indicate a force match. This rifle does not have that, but from what I can see it is the only thing that doesn't tie up
If anyone has any thoughts on it, what has been done (has it been butchered in terms of collector value) to it and if it is worth looking at I'd really appreciate the help.
Thank you in advance for your help!
New user here and like others, I am so glad I found this forum. I've been reading and reading about how to spot a 'fake' sniper from a real one but I'm still not 100% 'in the know' on it. I have seen two rifles, both pretty similar that appear to be 'genuine' snipers but I'm not sure if they have been refinished by an amateur, or by an arsenal...
Both are Izvhesk, one is 1943 and the other is 1944. As the pictures of the 1943 one online aren't great, I'll start by asking about the 44 one, as it has pretty high quality images. Here are my thoughts (again, I am new to this so I'm just stating what I can see based on what I've read).
- Appears to show all the correct marks. I can see the 'C' stamp on the receiver and although the image is top down, the serial number on the barrel shank can be seen as is the correct number of digits to match the scope's serial
- The rear sight has been scrubbed down to the white, which I have read was done during a refurb on PU snipers by another nation who used them (I cannot remember which, perhaps Poland or Yugoslavia?) but images I have seen of others are scrubbed right up beyond the 2000 mark
- The serial for the rifle and scope make me think it is original to the rifle. I say this because the I found a list of Mosin snipers on GB and the nb serial for several others seem to be in a similar range and the rifle and scope serial are in the same range as other matched rifle. The closest other rifle was - nb 2539 (PU, 1944, scope 4429245)
- As there is no serial etched onto the mount, I am guessing that the scope is original to the rifle and given the proximity to the rifle and scope serials on the point above, it leads me to believe it is so
- My only concern is that I've read on this forum that the bolt and magazine should have the letter prexfix on them, otherwise this could indicate a force match. This rifle does not have that, but from what I can see it is the only thing that doesn't tie up
If anyone has any thoughts on it, what has been done (has it been butchered in terms of collector value) to it and if it is worth looking at I'd really appreciate the help.
Thank you in advance for your help!