Preservation forum, please no altered military surplus rifles or discussions on altering in this forum. Please read the rules at the top of each forum.
Well in a word...yes. Its a real rifle. Just kidding you there...couldnt resist.
But you would need to post lots and lots of pics to see if it was an original sniper. Look at some of the other posts in the sniper section to see what pics are posted to make evaluations. The scope mount is not a PU which is the type that year would have. If it is had mounting holes for a PU then why would someone put that mount on it? See where Im going here...Hope that helps.
Governments don't live together.
People live together.
Governments don't give you a fair word
or a fair fight. I've come here to give you either one.
Or get either one from you.
have you read through the sniper papers on the header bar at the top of this forum ?...one of mine is included in the pictures as an example of a true sniper....good info...needs an expert update with all the new data and users on our site.....tom