Page 1 of 1
Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 11:44 am
by martin08
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 12:29 pm
by Greasemonkey
It has an original sling??

A rarity in it's self.
Nice find

Not too terrible of a price, I would have paid that with out the sling

Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 12:59 pm
by martin08
Greasemonkey wrote:It has an original sling??

A rarity in it's self.
Nice find

Not too terrible of a price, I would have paid that with out the sling

Ding, ding, ding, ding! Yes. These are VERY hard to come by. And most that you will see are from new-old-stock, and they will sometimes fetch up to $80. To find a Romanian made leather sling that is weathered and worn to the rifle is extremely rare. So, I'm liking it!
Yeah. I thought the price was fair, too. But I had to find some reason to haggle (sanded stock), without revealing that the sling was worth 1/3 of what they were asking for the whole gun!
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:25 pm
by Three_Dogs
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:32 pm
by Junk Yard Dog
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:11 pm
by kjohn

Good find. I can't say that I've ever seen a real live Romanian SKS.
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:52 pm
by JDennis
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:37 pm
by jayrocka1200
very nice !
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 11:43 pm
by Bareassmeagain
M08 buying a non-matching SkS is a rareity in itself. I have 3 1960's Tiger so don't feel alone
If you Still got that romanian spigot it should look just peachy on that warrior too !
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 7:20 am
by Sirex
Very nice. $340 for ANY SKS is a screamin deal around my area.
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 4:21 pm
by tjtM38
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 6:43 pm
by fenceline
Very nice.
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 3:02 pm
by gurn
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 4:49 pm
by martin08
Mine has traces of the white haze that was prevalent on the recent import batch of Chinese SKS's from Albania. And no, I did not clean it off. If that is the type of "mold" you are referring to, then it might have some significance to determining where these guns came from.
Yours has the exact sanding (coarse cross-grained) method, and oil finish as mine. All others that I've seen that are factory rearsenaled have the shellac finish. The serial number on the buttstock is erased. The slings are both well used, instead of new-old-stock like they are usually found.
So far, yours and mine are the only two Romanians that I've seen with these characteristics. Wondering if there was a shipment.... hmmm...
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:46 am
by gurn
Mine is # CD1645 and a 1958 like yours. They could have known each other
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 5:58 am
by Junk Yard Dog
Re: Wouldn't consider it a "steal", but... Romanian SKS
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:07 am
by Greasemonkey
Nice
These slings, while very elusive can be found, my second sling was an issued type. I got it from a forum member here

, it was a straw purchase sling, he bought it off Gunbroker, and shipped it to me

. Total price for it was $30

, It ended a years long search, and I finally could remove the Romanian Ak sling from it.
My new used issued sling mounted on my '59 Romanian, the top one. Bottom is my matching '57 Romanian with a new-old-stock sling, the sling has an ink stamp and date present. I've never been able to determine if they were rearsenaled or someone done it before I got them, both have a thick layer of shellac, the only mismatched parts on the '59 is the bolt and carrier. Both stock numbers are clear and present, and all the other usual stamping are very clear, just under shellac, so I guess both missed out on the sanding part.