The link does not seem to go to any statement by Vic about these rifles.Hlavinka wrote:Is Vic good enough?Junk Yard Dog wrote:I leave it to the experts
http://forums.gunboards.com/showthread. ... 30-snipers
Vic's been in this game long enough to know the real thing, or so I am told, I do not know Vic personaly.
My own suspicion is that these will be another bunch of fakes, I have had it up to here ( holds hand to top of head) with all this PU sniper shit. I personally never liked the PU, I hate it's scope, and mount design having been completely spoiled by having used fine western optics for a lifetime. The 91/30 infantry rifle has some of the best iron sights I have ever used on a rifle, and that is how I prefer to use them. Owning the real thing because it is an important piece of WW2 history, or Cold War history I can understand, even spending real money to own one for that reason. A fake has no history, so buying one implies that someone is willing to drop the cost of a good commercial sporter to own one as a shooter, and that boggles my mind as there is no rifle I would like as a shooter less.






