Compare to Drago's posted one.


































Drago wrote:I hope OO will post his 1951 in this thread, so we'll have two examples to look over in one spot. That is, until the Gunbroker auction fades or the seller pulls his pics.
My intention on doing this was to help educate and have fun, but not at a buyer/sellers expense. I feel like this forum is a good group of select firearms collectors and won't be against each other helping each other out. I wouldn't post this on some other forums, because...well, a number of reasons, I guess. It seemed appropriate here. If you guys like this kindof comparison value/price thingy (I think they are fun and we all learn something), I'll do one a week or so, or when I spot or see something that "just ain't right".
Just as some of you are still learing the SKS, I am struggling to learn the Mosin. I find the Mosin learning curve much greater than the SKS. You Mosin guru's rock!
Yup, as much as I'd love to collect these especially right now while they're still affordable it's out of the question for monitary reasons. I just hope they don't go to crazy in the meantime. Meanwhile I'll learn what I can. I have some of the best collectors to draw from and even call some friend. ;) Speaking of which Steve. I guess I've been asleep at the wheel. I didn't even hear about you getting the bayo for that one. Cool. I have to tell you. That rifle looks so tough in that second picture. The one on the chair. They really are some handsome rifles. They just ooze don't mess with me.Drago wrote:That's awesome Weldon. If I was only about collecting, I'd never post anything, only lurk and sponge off everyone else's knowledge and experience. I'm an ex-DDR firearms collector and I realize that the more people know about them, the more it might hurt my own acquiring, but I enjoy sharing information. If I know something that you don't and you know something that I don't, then I truly feel we reward each other.
Thanks OO, for posting a wonderful example of an as-issued SKS. I remembered your serial number and thought the one I posted about from GB was only a few numbers off. As it was, yours is a "DV17112" and that one is a "VD2102", in crylllic. I thought they were literally only 391 numbers off. I also didn't realize that the black bayonet on your firearm was not the original, as once suspected. I guess I missed your finding the original one. Bummer on the black one not being original from factory, but excellent that the seller had the original silver one and you got her back on the rifle.
Going from a memory clouded with other rifles I was interested in...Drago wrote:Well, I can tell you without looking, that the '52 Tula Laminate is a refurb. For me to spend $429 on it, it would first have to have an amazing stock color. I like the brilliant, almost "neon" amber lammies and the nicely finished dark garnet ones. A lot of them have an average reddish brown, dull finish. I stay away from those. Also, I would want to see the receiver and bolt in the blue and silver, not BBQ painted like my first example above. It would need to have a nice silver or black bayonet and cleaning rod. I never worry about a sling too much, but if it has it, then that is a bonus. The rifle would need to be completely numbers matching with hard stampings, not electro-penned bolt, for example. It is okay if the gas tube, piston and underneath of the rear sight ladder are e-penned. I'm picky, but for $429, I think one ought to be.pacanis wrote:What a timely thread.
I was making the circuit today and saw a '51 Tula laminate at a shop for $429 and was wondering if that was typical.
Watching this thread...
