Front sight post markings

"Collectors Forum" - All Mosin Nagant are discussed here. Also the Russian and "Finnish capture" SVT38 and SVT40. This is an excellent place for new Mosin owners to ask questions. We have some of the best experts here looking forward to your questions. If you post a Mosin sniper rifle here, we may or may not move it to the sniper forum.

Preservation forum, please no altered military surplus rifles or discussions on altering in this forum. No sportsters. Please read the rules at the top of each forum
Post Reply
Varmit1
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:43 pm
Location: Commiefornia

Front sight post markings

Post by Varmit1 »

I have a new 1936 Mosin Nagant M91/30. Bought it at Big 5 for $179.00 plus Commiefornia fees which added another $75.00.

It took me the better part of a whole day to disassemble, soak it in mineral spirits to remove the cosmoline and reassemble.

I took it to my local 25 yard indoor range and shot 5 rounds, one clip, at this target from a standing position ( they won't let you sit at this range because the locals shoot holes in their ceiling. It's an ethnic thIng).

Noticing that I was hitting right of center, I looked over the rear sight which was tight and unable to adjust for windage. Looking at the front hooded sight, it's noted that its on a dovetail and can slide left to right adjusting for wind age.

I had a set of smithing tools with me in my shooting bag, I popped that dovetail in the correct direction a might and shot a second clip of five rounds which hit dead center. All five rounds in a dead center pattern that can be covered with a quarter.

I was so surprised, knowing my capability, that it stunned me. I looked carefully at the front sight and noticed that there was an indentation struck in the front dovetail and post that I had inadvertently aligned when I popped it.

That sucker was dead on zeroed at 25 yards.

My question, does anyone have a pre WWII Mosin with this type of alignment mark?

I think this piece was issued, zeroed and marked by a Russian trooper and saw action against the Nazis.

I've got clear marks for the Izhevsk armory and no marks for it being rebuilt and all four serial numbers match; bolt, barrel, magazine and buttplate.

I've been shooting for 45 years and have NEVER had a rifle shoot this well "out of the box"; NEVER.

Image

Image

I love this Mosin rifle ... It is awesome. :shock:

I respect the folks that use this site and welcome any and all comments.
What's the difference between an Obama supporter and a Romney supporter?

A Romney supporter signs his check on the front ...
User avatar
BuckeyeSgt
Posts: 4506
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:48 am
Location: Fort Worth, TX

Re: Front sight post markings

Post by BuckeyeSgt »

You got that sucker zeroed in at 25. :thumbsup: Most of these were refurbed after the war and force matched. If there is a box with a a slash on the stock or receiver it has been refurbed. Post some pics of the marks and the whole rifle and we can know for sure.
Некто кроме нас
US Army 90-94 98G Russian
Army Reserves 94-98 37F
User avatar
desdem12
Posts: 16839
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:51 pm
Location: Eastern Washington

Re: Front sight post markings

Post by desdem12 »

Some nice shootin there. I would be more impressd if you did that at 100 yards. :thumbsup:
The commerce which maybe carried on with the people inhabiting the line you will pursue renders a knowledge of these people important ~Thomas Jefferson~ (to- Lewis and Clark)
Varmit1
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:43 pm
Location: Commiefornia

Re: Front sight post markings

Post by Varmit1 »

Shooting at 500 yards is coming up for me at the SLO Sportsman's club near Cuesta college off highway 1.

They got a 14" gong out there with a microphone I understand that rings if you hit through the rangemaster's speakers.

Here the receiver photo showing the hammer and sickle in the wreath (left) and the diamond with arrow for Izhevsk (right)

Image

I'll try to get a better photo of the receiver. This one could certainly be clearer. It's dark and my old lady is in bed. If I go rooting around the bedroom for the Mosin to take another photo tonight, I might end up on the couch! :shock:
What's the difference between an Obama supporter and a Romney supporter?

A Romney supporter signs his check on the front ...
User avatar
desdem12
Posts: 16839
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:51 pm
Location: Eastern Washington

Re: Front sight post markings

Post by desdem12 »

36 Izhevsk. Has a refurb mark on it. That is the square with a line in it. The triangle with an arrow is the Izhevsk arsenal mark. I am betting you will do good if the 25 is an indicator. Some of these are deadeye rifles. Just takes some gettin use to the triggers. :D
The commerce which maybe carried on with the people inhabiting the line you will pursue renders a knowledge of these people important ~Thomas Jefferson~ (to- Lewis and Clark)
Varmit1
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:43 pm
Location: Commiefornia

Re: Front sight post markings

Post by Varmit1 »

This one has a trigger that's smooth as silk before breaking, half the pull length of my SKS' and none of that rough grind.

It does have the refurb mark you describe from the fuzzy photo. Any ideas about the front post hood and dovetail markings?
What's the difference between an Obama supporter and a Romney supporter?

A Romney supporter signs his check on the front ...
User avatar
Junk Yard Dog
Owner/Founder
Owner/Founder
Posts: 48861
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:54 pm
Location: New York

Re: Front sight post markings

Post by Junk Yard Dog »

These rifles were sighted in with the bayonet mounted at the arsenal after the refurb, the front sight was then staked into place, they all have the alignment mark. Not every arsenal worker doing the refurb was a drunken commie f***up, some of them could do a very good job of setting up a rifle, I got lucky in a similar fasion with a 1938 Tula that I call Magic Tula for it's amazing shooting abilities right out of the box.
Leave it as it is. The ages have been at work on it and man can only mar it.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt
Post Reply