1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

All hand guns welcome and discussed here.

Preservation forum, please no altered military surplus handguns or discussions on altering in this forum (On Military firearms only). Please read the rules at the top of each forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
tjtM38
Posts: 2553
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2011 10:41 am
Location: Northeast Mississippi

1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by tjtM38 »

I purchased this nice Romanian Tokarev several years ago. I haven't shot it a lot, but it has a really nice trigger and a great looking finish on it. These pistols were refurbished and the stupid safety installed in order to allow import to the US on the surplus market. It's never made any sense to me why someone would dictate a modification to add a safety to a firearm that was never designed to have one. I have a Polish TTC that's very similar.

After shooting this one today with the safety switch moving on it's own to "safe" with the recoil of every shot, I couldn't stand it anymore. Upon cleaning, I removed the safety, never to be installed again. Now my previously nice looking piece has an ugly hole in the frame where the safety was. I saw some guy on YouTube drill the frame out, tapped it for screws and then welded the ends off. His gun looked worse than before. If anybody has any ideas on how to cover the holes, let me know. Oh, well; if it has to stay this way, it will be a much better shooter.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
tomaustin
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:56 pm

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by tomaustin »

the catch phrase is..."and the stupid safety installed in order to allow import to the US on the surplus market....

you could run into issues by altering the weapon..."allow import to the US"...could bring questions you don't want to have to answer.....

removing a safety device from any weapon is clearly not a well-thought-out choice....

would not recommend flashing it around if you continue to leave it in the altered condition.........Tom
User avatar
tjtM38
Posts: 2553
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2011 10:41 am
Location: Northeast Mississippi

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by tjtM38 »

tomaustin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 3:44 pm the catch phrase is..."and the stupid safety installed in order to allow import to the US on the surplus market....

you could run into issues by altering the weapon..."allow import to the US"...could bring questions you don't want to have to answer.....

removing a safety device from any weapon is clearly not a well-thought-out choice....

would not recommend flashing it around if you continue to leave it in the altered condition.........Tom
Well, I can't have it malfunctioning every time I shoot it. The safety that was installed is obviously defective. It makes the gun less safe. Therefore, I'll take whatever action I feel is appropriate to mitigate the defect.
User avatar
Junk Yard Dog
Owner/Founder
Owner/Founder
Posts: 48861
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:54 pm
Location: New York

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by Junk Yard Dog »

Crazy glue the damn thing in the off position and leave it that way. Nanny state bullshit.
Leave it as it is. The ages have been at work on it and man can only mar it.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
SA1911a1
Posts: 5996
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:19 pm
Location: North Florida

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by SA1911a1 »

Removing the safety would probably only become an issue if you accidently (negligently) shot someone. I don't think that altering the piece would cause any legal troubles otherwise, but I am no attorney. I am with the OP on this one, if I had a decent way to cover the hole, I would toss mine in the junk drawer and replace the buggered grip. Jim's solution is probably the best available.
Aut Pax Aut Bellum
tomaustin
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:56 pm

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by tomaustin »

I would immediately retire any weapon with a malfunctioning safety. When repaired, restore to service.

"Accidently (negligently) shot someone" is exactly what I am talking about....when an accident occurs, you were not aware it was going to happen---hence ACCIDENT................it is not worth the risk.....
User avatar
tjtM38
Posts: 2553
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2011 10:41 am
Location: Northeast Mississippi

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by tjtM38 »

I reinstalled the safety in the Romanian TT-33. It was hell getting it back in there; has a spring and a small detent that was difficult to get positioned in the frame. I just couldn't stand the hole in the frame with it removed. It is functional, but will probably flip to safe on it's own when I shoot it at the range. It is what it is and what can you expect for a cold war relic that only cost $220.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
tomaustin
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:56 pm

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by tomaustin »

tjtM38, it is what it is when we all love old weapons.....protecting yourself is the smart move.....it probably should be a wall-hanger...I have several of those kind of weapons.....and NO ammo within shouting distance......no mistakes, no accidents, no regrets, no apologies........Tom
User avatar
tjtM38
Posts: 2553
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2011 10:41 am
Location: Northeast Mississippi

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by tjtM38 »

tomaustin wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 7:55 pm tjtM38, it is what it is when we all love old weapons.....protecting yourself is the smart move.....it probably should be a wall-hanger...I have several of those kind of weapons.....and NO ammo within shouting distance......no mistakes, no accidents, no regrets, no apologies........Tom
Yeah; I think it is just an occasional shooter at best. The Polish TTC is much better as far as function and reliability. I actually trust the installed safety on that gun and would even consider it as a carry weapon, although there much better modern pistols in my safe for that purpose. In addition, 7.62x25 round is getting real expensive and I am not going to reload this caliber. These guns will be fired little in the future, but will just be admired for their curio and relic attributes.
tomaustin
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:56 pm

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by tomaustin »

Incidentally, I grew-up in the Delta.................
User avatar
tjtM38
Posts: 2553
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2011 10:41 am
Location: Northeast Mississippi

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by tjtM38 »

tomaustin wrote: ↑Sun Aug 14, 2022 5:43 pm Incidentally, I grew-up in the Delta.................
I did too; on the Arkansas side. It was a little town called Forrest City about 45 miles west of Memphis just the other sided of Crowley's Ridge. Over there it was massive farms of cotton, soybean and rice. It is still pretty much the same after all these years.
tomaustin
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:56 pm

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by tomaustin »

greenwood---major farming in the 40-50-60's period before California and Texas got into it big-time.............
User avatar
Rongo
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6581
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 6:39 pm
Location: Variable in my specific position of physical space

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by Rongo »

I had to fiddle with the safety on my Romanian as it too would be problematic. after a little trial & error with a file it flips on & off well & stays off when shooting.
"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it". Mark Twain

"Dang that entropy"
User avatar
steelbuttplate
Posts: 3938
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2013 2:24 pm
Location: Foxhole in the Smoky Mtns. N.C.

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by steelbuttplate »

I kept my Romanian, sold the Norinco. The Romy a little more accurate but I never could figure why.
" There are two kinds of people, the good people and the ones that aggravate the hell out of the good people"
User avatar
Darryl
Sniper Expert
Sniper Expert
Posts: 6176
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 12:33 pm
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Re: 1953 Romanian TT-33 Minus the Add-on Defective Safety

Post by Darryl »

SA1911a1 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 3:12 am Removing the safety would probably only become an issue if you accidently (negligently) shot someone. I don't think that altering the piece would cause any legal troubles otherwise, but I am no attorney. I am with the OP on this one, if I had a decent way to cover the hole, I would toss mine in the junk drawer and replace the buggered grip. Jim's solution is probably the best available.
I think you are correct. There are no laws on altering a weapon like that but, if something goes wrong, there may be liability issues.

I have the same pistol. My safety works perfectly. I guess I an lucky!

Darryl

tt33700.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Post Reply