Why these were done when regular 91-30s should have been plentiful is a mystery that I would like more info on.
Pahtu.







































































































Junk Yard Dog wrote:Given the length of time we are talking about, and most of it interesting times at that, variety is to be expected. Nice rifles.
Yeah, have only seen maybe one or two of those conversions on the forums - One was a Remington IIRC.Homer2 wrote:Right on! I love the Romanian conversions. Have to find a M44 made from a M91 also.
Sent from my 502SO using Tapatalk
Thanks, I guess it was something along that line, perhaps they had beat up rifles on hand and no supply of 91-30s, so use what they had and make up some 91-30s, guesses are all what we most likely will have given these were most likely made up 60 plus years ago.Fledge wrote:I guess as the old saying goes "Waste not Want not". Good looking rifle.
Not a machinest kind of guy....mebbe they turned down the barrel and then drilled out another stub of a barrel and then slipped it over and welded the bad boy on....dunno for sure?steelbuttplate wrote:It may be older than '21 check the tang date. WW1 refurbs were refurbed in the 20's into 91/30's before they got refurbed. A barrel extension? Would that be threaded on then tacked? I don't think I've seen that one before. Is that M-91 length?
I am a machinist, and what you say is what they did. Although it is likely they used the sight end from the barrel they were shortening.Pahtu wrote:Not a machinest kind of guy....mebbe they turned down the barrel and then drilled out another stub of a barrel and then slipped it over and welded the bad boy on....dunno for sure?steelbuttplate wrote:It may be older than '21 check the tang date. WW1 refurbs were refurbed in the 20's into 91/30's before they got refurbed. A barrel extension? Would that be threaded on then tacked? I don't think I've seen that one before. Is that M-91 length?
Pahtu.
That makes sense, I wondered about that. I am a teacher, teach kids welding, metal shop skills & plant science. Been doing so for 25 years, tho this is my last year - Will be renting out two houses & then substitute teaching when I feel like it - Will have less $$ for buying rifles for the collection....but then....I have much of what I want. I am looking forward to more free time to do what I want....millman wrote:I am a machinist, and what you say is what they did. Although it is likely they used the sight end from the barrel they were shortening.
Another member here hooked me up with my 1923 dated one. The markings were heavily buffed in refurb but are still readable. One of my favorites.qz2026 wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I've been looking for an RSFSR 91/30 for a longggggg time...
School me on RSFSR - I have four or five 1920's dated Tula rifles with stamps like the Tula stamp of this rifle above. I did a little search on RSFSR & thought it was a stamp like the PCCP stamp on my rifles....appears it is not?qz2026 wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I've been looking for an RSFSR 91/30 for a longggggg time...
Thanks, I did not know!racerguy00 wrote:The RFSFR is the translation of the one line on your rifle Pahtu. They switched to cccp in mid 1922 iirc