1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

If it fires black powder, it is discussed here.
User avatar
Buckhead
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 2:51 pm
Location: South Florida

1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Buckhead »

I have a 1863 navy arms Springfield .58 cal. My brother in l withw used for reenactments. I am going Deer hunting next weekend and I was wondering what load I should use.
It is in good shape and I have fired it a few times 60 gr. fffg and .570 round ball. What I want to know is what is a good safe load for Deer hunting. I never hunted with BP before and my son wants me to go with him. Any advice would be appreciated. Image
Ironnewt
Posts: 3021
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:44 am
Location: Northeastern Maryland

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Ironnewt »

Well, there's an old saying....."Bring Enough GUN" well the converse is true. You will not be under gunned with your current selection by any stretch of the imagination
Damn, I'll bet that's going to leave a mark! Probably hurt too!
"I think Congressmen should wear uniforms,
you know, like NASCAR drivers, so we could
identify their corporate sponsors."

"When I die, I want to be facing my enemies surrounded by their dead bodies and piles of spent brass"
"Never argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience." - Mark Twain

804
User avatar
desdem12
Posts: 16839
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:51 pm
Location: Eastern Washington

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by desdem12 »

Not too familiar with the loads on the .58s. I use 85-90gr ffg on my 54 lyman when I hunt elk with it. I think you could up that one a bit but the best thing to do is to run a few test loads at the range. Take a few different bullets if you can or if it has one it likes then start at the 60 and then go up 2 or 3 grains and see if the accuracy increases. I would say where around 75 or so but I don't own a .58 and am not familiar with the navy arms rifle. :D
The commerce which maybe carried on with the people inhabiting the line you will pursue renders a knowledge of these people important ~Thomas Jefferson~ (to- Lewis and Clark)
User avatar
desdem12
Posts: 16839
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:51 pm
Location: Eastern Washington

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by desdem12 »

http://www.chuckhawks.com/58_muzzleloaders.htm Here is an article about hunting with a .58. I didn't read it so not sure what brand but he uses 100 gr. :D
The commerce which maybe carried on with the people inhabiting the line you will pursue renders a knowledge of these people important ~Thomas Jefferson~ (to- Lewis and Clark)
User avatar
Buckhead
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 2:51 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Buckhead »

Thanks des. That gives me something to start with. .58 cal. is a little over kill for Florida Deer, but it is the only thing I have in BP. It is just a short 3 day season.
My boy has been trying to get me up to Ocala for a BP season for a few years and I think it is past time to do something about it. I am not getting any younger and I won't be around for ever. My Granny all way's said that some day we will be nothing more then memories in the minds of the ones we leave behind, and we should want them to be good ones.
User avatar
desdem12
Posts: 16839
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:51 pm
Location: Eastern Washington

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by desdem12 »

I looked for a manual from them and there isn't one. Some places I visited said they used upto 100gr ffg but listed 80gr as the main charge. If you can check muzzle velocity then I would start say at 70 and go up in 5g incriments to maybe 85-90 and see what the difference is. I think 75 or 80 might do the trick. It is always better to take more gun then you need then less gun. I would use it myself if I had one. I have a couple of magnums for black powder and I love them. They might be too much but not to me. Is just the funnest hunting I have ever done. :biggrin:
The commerce which maybe carried on with the people inhabiting the line you will pursue renders a knowledge of these people important ~Thomas Jefferson~ (to- Lewis and Clark)
User avatar
Buckhead
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 2:51 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Buckhead »

desdem12 wrote:I looked for a manual from them and there isn't one. Some places I visited said they used upto 100gr ffg but listed 80gr as the main charge. If you can check muzzle velocity then I would start say at 70 and go up in 5g incriments to maybe 85-90 and see what the difference is. I think 75 or 80 might do the trick. It is always better to take more gun then you need then less gun. I would use it myself if I had one. I have a couple of magnums for black powder and I love them. They might be too much but not to me. Is just the funnest hunting I have ever done. :biggrin:
Thanks for every thing dez. I would love to shoot an Elk some day. Thanks again dez.
User avatar
Junk Yard Dog
Owner/Founder
Owner/Founder
Posts: 48861
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:54 pm
Location: New York

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Junk Yard Dog »

60 grains FFG was the load used to kill men by the countless thousands during the States War, you shouldn't have a problem with it on deer.
Leave it as it is. The ages have been at work on it and man can only mar it.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Junk Yard Dog
Owner/Founder
Owner/Founder
Posts: 48861
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:54 pm
Location: New York

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Junk Yard Dog »

Instead of the round ball you could try the issue mini ball.
Leave it as it is. The ages have been at work on it and man can only mar it.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
desdem12
Posts: 16839
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:51 pm
Location: Eastern Washington

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by desdem12 »

I did find out that it is a 1:48 (fairly sure) twist so you can use the Minnie bullets or other types as well as lead balls. There should be a few different brands of Minnie or bullets around like buffalo or maybe knight. :D
The commerce which maybe carried on with the people inhabiting the line you will pursue renders a knowledge of these people important ~Thomas Jefferson~ (to- Lewis and Clark)
User avatar
Buckhead
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 2:51 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Buckhead »

desdem12 wrote:I did find out that it is a 1:48 (fairly sure) twist so you can use the Minnie bullets or other types as well as lead balls. There should be a few different brands of Minnie or bullets around like buffalo or maybe knight. :D
Thanks dez. I do have some Minnie and some round ball .570. I will use the Minnie for hunting. The round ball are a little loose and need a patch. You and Jim have been a great help and I appreciate every thing thank you.
Now all I have to do is shoot a Deer with this monster. Thanks again y'all.

I guess Sgt. Rob is still among the missing. I hope every thing is alright with him and the family.
Ironnewt
Posts: 3021
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:44 am
Location: Northeastern Maryland

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Ironnewt »

Years ago I shot one with a Minie' ball and liked to blow off the right front leg. It was a quartering shot from left rear.
Damn, I'll bet that's going to leave a mark! Probably hurt too!
"I think Congressmen should wear uniforms,
you know, like NASCAR drivers, so we could
identify their corporate sponsors."

"When I die, I want to be facing my enemies surrounded by their dead bodies and piles of spent brass"
"Never argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience." - Mark Twain

804
User avatar
Junk Yard Dog
Owner/Founder
Owner/Founder
Posts: 48861
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:54 pm
Location: New York

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Junk Yard Dog »

Round balls are all made to be used with a patch, T shirt material will usually do, just lube it up with bore butter, or some other BP bullet lube before using. Only in a revolver is a ball used without a patch.
Leave it as it is. The ages have been at work on it and man can only mar it.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Buckhead
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 2:51 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Buckhead »

I will be using the mini ball for hunting, The round ball is just a backup and for target shooting. Once Halloween is over I want to shoot some Pumpkins.
I have 25 mini balls but I am hoping I just need one :chuckles: :chuckles: :chuckles: thanks guys and wish me luck.
I am hankering for some Venison stew and chilly and sausage and on and on oh and Jim some :spam2:
User avatar
desdem12
Posts: 16839
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:51 pm
Location: Eastern Washington

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by desdem12 »

Good luck :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
The commerce which maybe carried on with the people inhabiting the line you will pursue renders a knowledge of these people important ~Thomas Jefferson~ (to- Lewis and Clark)
User avatar
Junk Yard Dog
Owner/Founder
Owner/Founder
Posts: 48861
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:54 pm
Location: New York

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Junk Yard Dog »

Did you cast the miniballs yourself? Or did you buy them ready made from Speer or some outfit like that? It's important that if you cast them yourself that you used soft lead, the softest pure lead, not wheelweight metal. Without soft lead the hollow of the bullet will not expand to grip the rifling and every round will keyhole.
Leave it as it is. The ages have been at work on it and man can only mar it.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Darryl
Sniper Expert
Sniper Expert
Posts: 6176
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 12:33 pm
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Darryl »

.

Second from the left is .58 for my Hawkins Hunter.

Image


I cast my own .58

Image


Dolk
User avatar
Buckhead
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 2:51 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Buckhead »

dolk wrote:.

Second from the left is .58 for my Hawkins Hunter.

Image


I cast my own .58

Image


Dolk
I think that is what I have. It looks like a hollow head on the receiving end of the mini ball. It looks like it will do some damage.
User avatar
Buckhead
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 2:51 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Buckhead »

Junk Yard Dog wrote:Did you cast the miniballs yourself? Or did you buy them ready made from Speer or some outfit like that? It's important that if you cast them yourself that you used soft lead, the softest pure lead, not wheelweight metal. Without soft lead the hollow of the bullet will not expand to grip the rifling and every round will keyhole.
No Jim I bought them . I do have some soft led 25 lb ingots that were used for ballast on a boat I have about 180 lbs. of it
User avatar
Junk Yard Dog
Owner/Founder
Owner/Founder
Posts: 48861
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:54 pm
Location: New York

Re: 1863 Springfield Navy arms .58 cal for hunting.

Post by Junk Yard Dog »

I sell that stuff for $1.10 a pound , so you are rich in lead :)
Leave it as it is. The ages have been at work on it and man can only mar it.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt
Post Reply