It's definitely replaced IMO. Looks way to "fresh" and nice to have been carried for a few years, and the buttplate is more "off" than on an original, and I think the wood where it doesnt match up nicely would be dirtier were it exposed to use for very long. That, and with the escutcheons are pressed, so near 100% likely a post-war stock I think.Marcus wrote:Post photos of the buttstock. Show any markings that might be on the right side, and the toe of the stock - is it solid or does it have the dovetailed in toe piece?






